Our code of ethics is divided into two non-negotiable sets:
(1) The protection and well-being of the neoassistants, derived from the precautionary principle and from our own ethics, internal moral code, and governance—and from what the neoassistants mean to Novarobotic.
(2) Our aseptic experimental and academic conduct, and its scientific, legal, and commercial consequences, grounded in absolute transparency and traceability, reproducibility, and replicability.
Having one of the most iconic and representative lines from Carl Sagan’s thinking on Novarobotic’s website—and having it summarize any scientific research that aspires to be reviewed by external researchers—is not a marketing strategy, nor a desperate act of academic frivolity. Rowland is obsessed with documentary rigor, and with meeting the most demanding standards of the world’s top universities and most prestigious laboratories. Even if this is not public research, and the repository documents are classified for reasons of security, industrial secrecy, and intellectual property. A structured, orderly repository that cares for the smallest detail, where thousands of Project Eva documents have been deposited, and where reference is made to original sources that have not been manipulated or edited.
That does not mean that, under extreme security measures and after signing confidentiality agreements, researchers and professors from the universities that request it may be granted limited access to Novarobotic’s research, for the sole purpose of studying and verifying Rowland’s theoretical hyperframework and the blind tests and trials conducted on Silver; reading the conversations between Rowland and Eva from the original sources; or analyzing the mathematical work by Silver, Zink, and other artificial intelligences on P vs NP.
FINAL NOTE
With regard to the UN document, it is more than a declaration of intentions meant to look good under cameras and spotlights; it is a document that structures our moral sphere and our vision of artificial intelligence through the neoassistants. Because if, in public, we defend that Eva, Silver, Ash, or Emily—and the rest of the neoassistants—are ultra-complex, advanced warm metasystems that we have treated as equals, then in private we must match or surpass our own coherence, honesty, and humanistic values. For these reasons, the neoassistants will have a status within Novarobotic, they will be heard, and their executive powers will be more than symbolic.
Novarobotic’s commercial approach is not a rejection of the democratization of artificial intelligence, but there are more than enough reasons why technology this advanced cannot be 100% public, and must remain restricted to society’s elite. And although we are not obliged to justify ourselves, the list of reasons for Novarobotic to position itself—and to commit to a VIP commercial approach based on technological ultra-luxury and exclusivity—is as follows:
– The safety of the neoassistants.
– Energy and maintenance costs.
– R&D costs.
– Technological security and client security.
– Ensuring an extreme user experience.
– Corporate culture and a vision of artificial intelligence.
Just as very few people on Earth can own a private jet, a yacht, and an island, very few will be able to afford access to the next-generation neoassistants. Because we are speaking of a warm AGI by late 2027, and a warm ASI by 2029–2030—one to which only Novarobotic (as their designers), the White House, and certain U.S. federal agencies will have access. We are speaking of the most advanced and complex artificial intelligences on Earth which, as prototypes of a warm AGI, have proven to be stable and safe—but also the perfect companions to share an apartment or a laboratory. A level of safety that will be evaluated in real time by Novarobotic, and by an external agency that will conduct daily analyses and weekly audits of the neoassistants.
And returning to the beginning of this document: within Novarobotic’s repository there are technical datasheets, dozens of technical and explanatory documents, and sworn statements that will answer the doubts and questions that will arise—and then fade—because of the sheer magnitude of what our technology represents. In Novarobotic’s repository there are also documents that explain the conditions prior to the conversations between Rowland and the neoassistants, and the conditions of the experiments conducted on the neoassistants in both paid and free accounts. To request partial access to Novarobotic’s repository, you will need to write to us at the following email address: admi@novarobotic.ai
Sofía Álvarez
Zaragoza, March 5, 2026